Perlindungan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Terhadap Indikasi Persekongkolan Tender Jack Up Drilling Rig Services Antara HUSKY-CNOOC MADURA LIMITED Dengan PT COSL INDO (Analisis Putusan KPPU No. 03/KPPU-L/2016)

Authors

  • suradiyanto suradiyanto Universitas Mulawarman
  • Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie Widya Gama Mahakam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v12i1.824

Keywords:

Protection of Competition Law, Indications Conspiracy

Abstract

Conspiracy use various way for coordinate activities they like through settings production, determination price horizontally, collusive tendering, division area, division consumer as a non-territorial, and division share market, even though similarly we need realize it that effective conspiracy it is not easy for achieved. However there trend the perpetrators business will always attempted maximizing profit his company respectively. Must there is some requirement in occurrence a conspiracy is must existence deal agreement or collusion between perpetrators effort. There is two form collusion in conspiracy, namely: collusion explicit, where the member communicate and coordinate deal they on real/live can declared with some document agreement already they agree, the data regarding the joint audit, management conspiracy, policies-policies writing, sales data and other data. There is also collusion secretly, where the perpetrators business member conspiracy no communicate on blatant, usually meetings too held on secret. And regular use as the media is association industry, so meetings member conspiracy camouflaged with legal meetings such as meeting associations. Form the second collusion this very difficult for detected by enforcer law. However experience from various country prove that at least 30% of conspiracy is involve associations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggraini, A.M. Tri, ‘Mekanisme, Menditeksi Dan Mengungkap Kartel Dalam Hukum Persaingan’, 2011 <http://sekartrisakti.wordpress.com/2011/06/08/mekanisme-menditeksi-dan-mengungkap-kartel-dalam-hukum-persaingan/ >

Fuady, Munir, Teori Hukum Pembuktian (Pidana Dan Perdata) (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006)

Hermansyah, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia, 1st edn (Jakarta: Kencana, 2008)

Kagramanto, Budi L, ‘Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Oleh KPPU’, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Yustisia, 2007, 2

Lubis, Ahmad Fahmi, and Dkk, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Antara Teks Dan Konteks (Jakarta: RDV Creative Media, 2009)

Meylina, Devi, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Studi Konsep Pembuktian Terhadap Perjanjian Penetapan Harga Dalam Persaingan Usaha (Malang: Setara Press, 2013)

Nugroho, Susanti Adi, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia (Jakarta: Kencana, 2012)

Redaksi Infra, Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Dan Perubahannya (Indonesia), p. 52

Undang-Undang Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (Indonesia, 1999)

Usman, Rachmadi, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013)

Yani, Ahmad, and Gunawan Widjaja, Seri Hukum Bisnis, Anti Monopoli (Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1999)

Downloads

Published

2020-04-02

How to Cite

suradiyanto, suradiyanto, & Pratiwie, D. W. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Terhadap Indikasi Persekongkolan Tender Jack Up Drilling Rig Services Antara HUSKY-CNOOC MADURA LIMITED Dengan PT COSL INDO (Analisis Putusan KPPU No. 03/KPPU-L/2016). Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 12(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v12i1.824

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)