RELEVANSI TEORI KLASIK DALAM KONTEKS ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK MODERN
Keywords:
Relevansi, Teori Klasik, Administrasi Publik ModernAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi relevansi teori klasik dalam konteks administrasi publik modern. Teori klasik, yang melibatkan konsep-konsep seperti divisi kerja, hierarki, dan prinsip-prinsip manajemen, dikembangkan pada abad ke-19 dan awal abad ke-20 oleh para pemikir seperti Max Weber, Frederick Taylor, dan Henri Fayol. Meskipun teori ini muncul pada periode industrialisasi awal, pertanyaan yang muncul adalah sejauh mana konsep-konsep tersebut masih relevan dalam menghadapi kompleksitas dan dinamika administrasi publik saat ini. Metode penelitian melibatkan analisis literatur untuk memeriksa aspek-aspek kunci teori klasik dan kemudian mengidentifikasi bagaimana aspek-aspek tersebut dapat diterapkan atau disesuaikan dalam administrasi publik modern. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sementara beberapa konsep teori klasik tetap relevan, perlu ada penyesuaian untuk mencocokkan tantangan dan perubahan lingkungan yang dihadapi oleh lembaga-lembaga publik saat ini. Temuan ini memberikan wawasan tentang cara menggabungkan warisan teori klasik dengan inovasi yang sesuai dengan dinamika administrasi publik modern. Implikasinya adalah perlunya pengembangan model manajemen yang adaptif dan berorientasi pada hasil, yang dapat menggabungkan keunggulan konsep-konsep klasik dengan kebutuhan masyarakat dan lingkungan yang terus berubah
References
Argyris, C. 1960. Understanding Organisational Behaviour. Dorsey Hoomewood: Illinois.
Bakker, J. I. (Hans). 1988. "Patrimonialism, Involution and the Agrarian Question in Java: A Weberian Analysis of Class Relations and Servile Labor".
Chap. 16, pg. 279-301 in Gledhill, John (ed.) State and Society: The Emergence and Development of Social Hierarchy and Political Centralisation. London: Unwin Hyman, Ltd.
Bourgon, J. 2011. A New Synthesis of Public Administration: Serving in the 21st Century. Canada: McGill-Queens University Press.
Bourgon, J. 2008. The Future of Public Service A Search for a New Balance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67, No.4, pp: 390-404.
Copley, Frank Barkley. 1993. Frederick W. Taylor: Father of Scientific Management, Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Dagger, R. 1997. Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship and Republican Liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Denhardt, J.V. and Denhardt, R.B. 2003. The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Armonk, NY: M.E Sharpe.
Fayol, Henri.1949. General and Industrial Management. (Translated by C. Storrs), London: Pitman.
Goodnow, F.J. 1900. Politics and Administration :A Study in Government. New York: Russell and Russell, pp: 17-26.
Gordon, G.J.1978. Public Administration in America. New York: St. Martins Press.
Gouldner, A. W. (1959). "Organizational Analysis." in Sociology Today. edited by R. K. Merton, L.
Broom and L. S. J. Cottrell. New York: Basic Books, 400-428.
Gulick, Luther. and Urwick, L. eds. 1937. Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
Gulick Luther, 1965. `The Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the American Society for Public Administration,' Public Administration Review 25,1.
Hersey, P and Blanchard, K. 1977. Management of Organisational Behaviour. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Herzberg, F. 1964. The Motivation-Hygiene Concept. Personnel Administration, January-February.
Jackson, P.M. 1982. The Political Economy of Bureaucracy. Oxford: Philip Allan Publishers Ltd.
Kettl, D.F. 2000. The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Likert, R. 1967. The Human Organisation. McGraw-Hill.
Maslow, A. A. 1943. A Theory of Motivation. Psychological Review, 50 (4):370:96.
Mayo, E. 1933. The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. New York: Viking.
Morgan, G. 1998. Images of Organisation: The Executive Edition. London: Sage Publications.
McGregor, D.M.1960. The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Norman, Cuthbert. 1970. Fayol and the Principles of Organizations, In Anthony Tillet et al., eds, Management Thinkers ( Harmondsworth, Middlesex, Penguin,:108-39.
Parsons, T. 1960. Structure and Process in Modern Societies. Illinois: Free Press.
Pranger, R.J. 1968. The Eclipse of Citizenship: Power and Participation in Contemporary Politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Roethlisberger, F. and Dickson, W. 1939. Management and the Worker. John Wiley.
Rose, R. 1974. The Problems of Party Government. London: Macmillan.
Rose, Michael. 1975. Industrial Behaviour: Theoretical Development Since Taylor, London: Allen Lane.
Rotmans, J., Rene, K. and Marjolein, A. 2001. More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy. The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy 3 (1), 15-31.
Sarker S.I., Rafiul, M. and Khan, A. 2013. Classical and Neoclassical Approaches of Management: An Overview. Journal of Business and Management, 14 (6), 1-5.
Simon, Herbet. A. 1946. The Proverbs of administration. Public Administration Review, 6 (1), 53-67.
Stone, D.1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W.W. Norton.
Svara, J. H. 2001. The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration. Public Administration Review , 61, (2), 176-83.
Taylor, Frederick W. 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management .New York: Harper Bros., 5-29 Taylor, Frederick W. 1947 . Principles of Scientific Management. New York, Harper and Row.
Vroom, V.H. 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: McGraw-Hill. Weber, M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation. London: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, Woodrow. 1887. The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly 2, (2), 197-222.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fifi Febriandiela Fifi, M. Fachri Adnan Adnan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
