POTENSI EKONOMI SEKTORAL DAN KOMODITI UNGGULAN DAERAH PENYANGGA IKN (SAMARINDA, BALIKPAPAN, PENAJAM PASER UTARA, DAN KUTAI KARTANEGARA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24903/je.v14i1.3113Keywords:
location quotient, LQ, SLQ, DLQAbstract
The economic potential and superior commodities of the region are interpreted as sectors and commodities that have high competitiveness. A sector is said to have great potential if it has a fairly high comparative advantage (advantage) compared to the same sector in other regions. The purpose of this study is to measure the comparative advantages of a sector, subsector, or superior commodity in the buffer area of the Nusantara IKN, namely Balikpapan, North Penajam Paser, Samarinda, and Kutai Kartanegara. The research method is quantitative descriptive. The data collection technique uses documentation studies with external data sources (secondary data), namely utilizing and collecting data from official documents or data that has been processed by other institutions or organizations, such as census data or economic data government reports, regional economic statistics agencies, or scientific publications. The data used are GDP data and the GDP growth rate or economic growth rate of each sector or subsector according to the business field for the period 2018–2022 in the IKN buffer area; Samarinda, Balikpapan, Penajam, and Tenggarong. The technical data analysis uses the Location Quotient (LQ) analysis method. LQ is used to find out how much specialization the base or leading sectors have. LQ analysis uses two analysis methods, namely static location quotient (SLQ) and dynamic location quotient (DLQ). The results of the study concluded that Samarinda City has 14 base/flagship economic sectors, where the financial services sector is the leading sector. Balikpapan City has 13 base/flagship economic sectors, with the leading sector being transportation and warehousing. North Penajam Paser Regency (PPU) has 9 base/flagship economic sectors; the Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries sectors are the leading sectors, while the lagging sectors are the Accommodation and Food and Beverage Provision Sector. Kutai Kartanegara Regency only has 2 base/flagship economic sectors as leading sectors, namely the Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries sector and the Mining and Quarrying sector, and the lagging sectors are the Electricity and Gas Procurement Sector and the Construction sector.
References
Adyatama, E., & Hantoro, J. (2019). Lima Alasan Jokowi Pindahkan Ibu Kota ke Kalimantan Timur. From Tempo.co: https://nasional.tempo.co
Ahdiat, A. (2023). Ini Operator Seluler dengan Pengguna Terbanyak di Indonesia Awal 2023. From Databoks: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/06/23/ini-operator-seluler-dengan-pengguna-terbanyak-di-indonesia-awal-2023
BPS. (2022). Konsep PDRB. From BPS Kaltim: https://kaltim.bps.go.id
El Rahman, V. (2023). Eks Menteri Bappenas Ungkap Alasan Kenapa Ibu Kota Harus Pindah Segera. From IDN Times: https://www.idntimes.com/
Halik, A. (2019). A. Attitude as A Variable Between the Effect of Security, Cleanliness and Public Facilities on Domicile Decisions in Satellite City of Sidoarjo District. Jurnal Terapan Manajemen dan Bisnis (JTMB), 1-18.
Hasibuan, R. R., & Aisa, S. (2020). Dampak dan Resiko Perpindahan Ibu Kota Terhadap Ekonomi Di Indonesia. Jurnal At-Tawassuth, 183-203.
Intan, G. (2019). Jokowi Resmi Putuskan Ibu Kota Negara Pindah ke Kalimantan Timur. From VOA Indonesia: https://www.voaindonesia.com
Jamna, S. A. (2023). 5 Dampak Positif Pemindahan Ibukota Negara ke Kalimantan. From Okezone: https://economy.okezone.com/
Jatayu, A., Dearista, A., Argentino, J., & Agung, A. (2016). Pengembangan Ekonomi Wilayah Kabupaten Bangil Dengan Konsep Minapolitan. Surabaya: Institut Teknologi 10 November.
JDIH BPK. (2022). UU Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 tentang Ibu Kota Negara. From bpk.go.id: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/198400/uu-no-3-tahun-2022
Lee, C. M., & Ahn, K. H. (2005). Five new towns in the Seoul metropolitan area and their attractions in non-working trips: Implications on self-containment of new towns. Habitat International, 647-666.
Merrilees, B., Miller, D., & Herington, C. (2013). City Branding: A Facilitating Framework for Stressed Satellite Cities. Journal of Business Research, 37-44 .
Petriella, Y. (2022). Ini Alasan di Balik Pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara ke Nusantara. From Bisnis.com: https://ekonomi.bisnis.com
Putra, M. F. (2011). Studi Kebijakan Publik dan Pemerintahan dalam Perspektif. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya (UB) Press.
Safitri, S. T., Wiguna, C., Kusumawardani, D. M., & Wibowo, I. Y. (2021). Klasifikasi Kepuasan Pelanggan Menggunakan Metode Classification and Regression Tree (CART). Jurnal Sains Komputer & Informatika (J-SAKTI), 337-349.
Salsabila, D. A. (2023). Dampak Pemindahan Ibu Kota Indonesia ke IKN Kalimantan Timur dalam Aspek Ekonomi Wilayah. From Kompasiana: https://www.kompasiana.com
Sjafrizal. (2018). Analisis Ekonomi Regional dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian. Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukirno, S. (2016). Makro Ekonomi Teori Pengantar. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Suryakusumah, I. (2023). Wajib Tahu! Ini Dampak Positif dan Negatif Pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara. From Inilah.com: https://www.inilah.com/
Tarigan, R. (2014). Ekonomi Regional Teori dan Aplikasi, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Tysara, L. (2023). IKN adalah Ibu Kota Nusantara, Ini Alasan Pemindahan Ibu Kota Jakarta ke IKN. From Merdeka.com: https://www.merdeka.com/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Erni Setiawati, Siti Rohmah, Winda Dwi Cahyani, Lia Novi Nur Rahayu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.