Tanggungjawab Korporasi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Pegawai

(Kasus Alat Tes Rapid Menggunakan Antigen Daur Ulang)

Authors

  • Hartanto Universitas Widya Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v13i2.1892

Keywords:

Responsibility;, Criminal;, Corporate;, BUMN;, Health;

Abstract

Background:

In the government's efforts to control the spread of the Covid-19 virus, news broke about employees of a corporation using used (recycled) antigens at Kualanamu Airport in Medan. Some people who incidentally are health workers from BUMN abuse their circumstances/authority to the detriment of society and endanger the lives of patients/consumers. This health worker who is an employee of this BUMN has committed a crime, then this act that harms the public is quite broad, indirectly/indirectly related to corporate responsibility (BUMN).

Research Methods:

This writing uses a statutory approach related to the case of recycling antigen devices. This type of normative legal research examines library materials or secondary data and tertiary legal materials. Secondary data consists of legal materials in the form of journals, scientific documents and expert opinions. This is a juridical-normative research that examines the application of positive legal norms, to seek the truth of coherence, namely whether the rule of law is in accordance with legal norms and legal principles, then also conducts problem solving to provide prescriptions, or descriptions of the formulation of the problem. The laws and regulations used as analysis are Law 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, Perma Number 13 of 2016, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 62/PUU-XI/2013, and the Criminal Code.

Findings:

Jurisprudence in Indonesia is not necessarily the actions of branch employees of PT. Kimia Farma Diagnostics can be related to the responsibility of the directors/corporations, as long as there is no evidence of negligence from the board of directors for this criminal act, or the negligence of the board of directors in supervising the head of the branch.

Conclusion:

Criminal acts committed by the perpetrators can be subject to several criminal sanctions in the field of health or consumer protection, but linking them to corporations (BUMN) requires further proof of elements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, James M, and Ivan Waggoner, The Changing Role of Criminal Law in Controlling Corporate Behavior (Rand Corporation, 2014)
Ariawan, I Gusti Ketut, ‘Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif’, Kertha Widya, 1.1 (2013) Arief, Barda Nawawi, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi (Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada, 2019)
Aripkah, Nur, ‘Persoalan Kriteria Batasan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi: Tinjauan Terhadap Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016’, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27.2 (2020), 367–87
<https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art8>
bumn.info, ‘PT Kimia Farma, Industri Farmasi Pertama Indonesia Dan Tetap Berjaya’, 2020 Effendi, Bachtiar, ‘Pembangunan Daerah Otonom Berkeadilan’, Yogyakarta: Uhaindo Dan Offset, 2002
Hartanto, Hartanto, ‘Karakteristik Penerapan Hukum Ekonomi Terhadap Pembangunan Di Indonesia’, Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum, 1.2 (2019), 137–48 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v1i2.45>
Hartanto, Hartanto, and Cut Wilda Meutia Syafiina, ‘Efektivitas Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Produk Kosmetik Yang Tidak Memiliki Izin Edar Balai Besar Pengawas Obat Dan Makanan Diy (Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana)’, Jurnal Meta-Yuridis, 4.1 (2021)
<https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26877/jm-y.v4i1.6765>
Indonesia, Presiden Republik, Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 (Indonesia, 1999)
Iqbal, Muhammad, ‘Duh! 9.000 Orang Jadi Korban Tes Antigen Bekas Di Kualanamu’,
Www.Cnbcindonesia.com, 2021
Karmilia, Rise, ‘Fungsionalisasi Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Dibidang Asuransi’, Jurnal Ilmiah Cano Ekonomos, 6.2 (2017), 115–26
Ketua Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Oleh Korporasi (Indonesia, 2016)
Kusumasari, Diana, ‘Fiduciary Duty Direksi Dan Dewan Komisaris PT’, Hukumonline.Com, 2021
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, ‘Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 62/PUU- XI/2013 Tanggal 18 September 2014’, Jdih.Bumn.Go.Id, 2013
Mahyani, Ahmad, ‘Tanggung Jawab Pidana Direksi Bumn Yang Merugi’, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 2.1 (2019), 1
Manullang, Herlina, and Riki Yanto Pasaribu, Pertangungjawaban Pidana Korporasi
(Medan: LPPMUHN Press Universitas HKBP Nommensen, 2020)
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi) (Jakarta: Prenada, 2005)
Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, ‘Keputusan Menkes No. HK.01.07/MENKES/3602/2021 Tentang Perubahan Atas Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor HK.01.07/MENKES/446/2021 Tentang Penggunaan Rapid Diagnostic Test Antigen Dalam Pemeriksaan Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19)’, JDIH BPK RI, 2021
Muladi, and Dwidja Priyatno, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi (Jakarta: Prenadamedia Grup, 2010)
Presiden Republik Indonesia, Republik Indonesia Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2005 Tentang Pengesahan International Covenant On Civil And Political Rights (Kovenan Internasional Tentang Hak-Hak Sipil Dan Politik) (Indonesia, 2005)
———, ‘Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009’, JDIH Kemenkeu, 2009
———, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas, 2007
———, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Dengan Rahmat Tuhan Yang Maha Esa (Indonesia, 1999)
Puspoayu, Elisabeth Septin, Arief Rachman Hakim, and Hanum Selsiana Bella, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pencemaran Minyak Di Wilayah Teluk Balikpapan’, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25.3 (2018), 560–80
<https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss3.art7>
Rissy, Yafet Yosafet W, ‘Doktrin Piercing The Corporate Veil: Ketentuan Dan Penerapannya Di Inggris, Australia Dan Indonesia’, Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4.1 (2019), 1–20 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1>
Rusdi, Muhamad, ‘Penanganan Intoleransi Oleh Pemerintah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta’,
Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum, 3.1 (2021), 129–45
Sari, Haryanti PuspaHal, ‘Petugas Kimia Farma Diagnostik Pakai Alat Rapid Test Bekas, Pakar Hukum: Pidananya Bisa Ditambah Sepertiga Aman’, Kompas.Com, 2021
Sidabalok, Janus, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Di Indonesia (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006)
Sinaga, Reine, Budiman N P D Sinaga, and Marthin Simangungsong, ‘Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Direktur Perseroan Terbatas Atas Tindak Pidana Perpajakan Yang Dilakukan Secara Berlanjut (Studi Putusan Nomor 1501/Pid. Sus/2019/Pn. Jkt-Brt)’, Jurnal Hukum PATIK, 6.3 (2017), 217–28
Sumartiningtyas, Holy Kartika Nurwigati, ‘Setahun Pandemi Di Indonesia, Apa Saja Penanganan Covid-19 Yang Harus Dibenahi?’, Kompas.Com, 2021
Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina, and A’an Efendi, Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research) (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014)
Utomo, Anandito, ‘Prosedur Penuntutan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korporasi’,
Hukumonline.Com, 2014

Downloads

Published

2021-08-23

How to Cite

Hartanto. (2021). Tanggungjawab Korporasi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Pegawai: (Kasus Alat Tes Rapid Menggunakan Antigen Daur Ulang). Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 13(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v13i2.1892

Issue

Section

Articles