LEGALISASI GANJA MEDIS (ANALISIS PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 106/PUU-XVIII/2020)

Authors

  • ERIK DWI PRASSETYO UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA

Keywords:

Judge's Consideration, Impact of Decision Number 106/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Abstract

Indonesia is a state of law, the basic law for all laws and regulations in Indonesia is the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In an effort to uphold the constitution and the principles of a democratic rule of law, the Constitutional Court has the authority to examine laws on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. to find out how the judges of the Constitutional Court considered the decision Number 106/PUU-XVIII/2020 and to find out the impact of the decision. This study uses a normative juridical approach with a descriptive analytical method which will explain the description of the analysis of the data that has been collected. Based on the results of the research on Decision Number 106/PUU-XVIII/2020, it can be concluded that the judge in his decision had careful considerations such as looking at the facts contained in the trial and considering the results of the examination of related parties. The impact of this decision is that the public is prohibited from using class I narcotics for health services. The use of narcotics is only allowed within the scope of the development of science and technology. There is a strong impetus for research on the use of class I narcotics in the government and the private sector.
Keywords: Judge's Consideration, Impact of Decision Number 106/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abel, Marijuana: The First 12,000 Years. Platinum Press. 1980.

Firman, Ananda. Skripsi, Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Alternatif Pengobatan Medis Tanaman Ganja Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Berdasarkan Ratifikasi Konvensi Tunggal Pbb Tahun 1961 (Tentang Narkotika). Aceh: Uin Ar-Raniry, 2021.

Http://Www.Lgn.Or.Id/China-Memegang-Kendali-Lebih-Dari300-Hak-Paten-Ganja-Medis-Industri-Berapa-Banyak-Yang-Indonesia-Pun.

Kenapa Ganja Legal Di Thailand? Ini 3 Alasannya Halaman All - Kompas.Com.

Kini Ganja Medis Legal Di New York (Cnnindonesia.Com).

Latif Abdul, Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media, 2007.

Mukthie, Fadjar Abdul Hukum Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jendral Dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Ri,2006.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/Puu-Xviii/2020 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika.

Sejarah Dan Pembentukan, Kedudukan, Serta Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Mkri.Id),

Sejarah Terbentuknya Mahkamah Konstitusi | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Mkri.Id).

Soekanto, Soejono Dan Sri Mahmudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat,. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.

Soekanto, Soejono, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Ui Press, 1986.

Tim Lgn, Hikayat Pohon Ganja. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2011.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-26

How to Cite

ERIK DWI PRASSETYO. (2022). LEGALISASI GANJA MEDIS (ANALISIS PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 106/PUU-XVIII/2020). Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 14(1), 59–72. Retrieved from https://journal.uwgm.ac.id/yuriska/article/view/1597

Issue

Section

Articles