Kedudukan Pembeli Apartemen Sebagai Kreditor Dalam Hal Pengembang Dinyatakan Pailit

(Studi Perbandingan Hukum Antara Indonesia Dan India)

Authors

  • Veronica Ganesha De Rosario Universitas Indonesia
  • Tiurma Mangihut P.
  • Cristy Franzlay

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v13i2.1896

Keywords:

Comparative Law;, Creditors;, Apartments;, Bankruptcy;

Abstract

Background:
It is important for everyone to have a place to live, one of which is the concept of multi-storey housing which we usually know as flats or apartments. However, in the buying process, there are many injustices, especially when the developer is declared bankrupt. Indonesia is not firm and fair in its efforts to protect the rights of apartment buyers. In India, which provides more legal certainty and provides protection for the rights that should be obtained by the buyer.
Research Metodes:

The form of this research uses a normative juridical research form. The nature of this research is descriptive. The object of research that this author contains contains legal principles, where the object of research is sourced from secondary data and is supported by primary data. Qualitative research, namely data analysis with more emphasis on the quality or content of the data. In terms of drawing conclusions, the author uses a deductive mindset.
Findings:
By dismissal of judicial review appeal to make the apartment buyer's position become a secured creditor in the developer's bankruptcy case, apartment buyer’s debt in Indonesia is still classified as an ordinary debt which the repayment is applied for according to Articles 1131 KUH Perdata (civil code). Actually apartment buyers' debt could be given a privilege rights position, but according to Articles 1134 of KUH Perdata (civil code), that rights must be granted in a statute. In India, the IBC receivables from apartment buyers are classified as a financial debt.
Conclusion:
Indonesia currently has the position of apartment consumers as concurrent creditors in bankruptcy, so it is different from India which has given apartment consumers the position as financial creditors based on section 5(8)(f) IBC 2018. So that the priority of paying apartment consumers' receivables is aligned with bank receivables and other financial institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Harsono, Boedi. Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Djambatan, 2008.
Panjaitan, Hulman. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Penerbit Jala Permata Aksara, 2021.
Prapti Rahayu, Derita. Pengantar Hukum Kepailitan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Thafa Media, 2020.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan (Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang) Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: PrenadaMedia, 2016.
Sulasdino, Arif. Kebijakan Pembangunan Rumah Susun (Rusun). Tangerang: Indocamp, 2019.
Witanto, D.Y. Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen (Aspek Perikatan, Pendaftaran, dan Eksekusi). Bandung: CV.Mandar Maju, 2015.
II. Artikel Internet
“Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Implications for Real Estate Sector.” www.resurgentindia.com. 05 September 2021.
“Treating The Homebuyers As Financial Creditors: An Enduring Solution or Not?,” www.manupatra.com. 16 September 2021.
III. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Indonesia, Undang-Undang tentang Rumah Susun, UU No. 20 Tahun 2011, LN No.108 Tahun 2011, TLN No. 5252.
_______, Undang-Undang tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, UU No. 37 Tahun 2004, LN No. 131 Tahun 2004, TLN No.4443.
_______, Undang-Undang tentang Cipta Kerja, UU No. 11 Tahun 2020, LN No. 245 Tahun 2020, TLN No. 6573.
_______, Undang-Undang tentang Ketenagakerjaan, UU No. 13 Tahun 2003, LN No. 39 Tahun 2003, TLN No. 4279.
_______, Undang-Undang tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan, UU No. 28 Tahun 2007, LN No. 85 Tahun 2007, TLN No. 4740.
_______, Undang-Undang tentang Usaha Perasuransian, UU No. 40 Tahun 2014, LN No. 337 Tahun 2014, TLN No. 5618.
_______, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek). Diterjemahkan oleh Subekti dan R.Tjitrosudiro. Cet.43. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2017.
India, The Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code No. 31 Of 2016.
____, The Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) No. 26 Of 2018.
____, The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 No. 16 Of 2016.
IV. Putusan Pengadilan
Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 88/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-23

How to Cite

De Rosario, V. G., Tiurma Mangihut P., & Franzlay, C. . (2021). Kedudukan Pembeli Apartemen Sebagai Kreditor Dalam Hal Pengembang Dinyatakan Pailit: (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Antara Indonesia Dan India). Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 13(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v13i2.1896

Issue

Section

Articles