IMPLIKASI PRAKTIK MONEY POLITICS TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMILIH PADA PEMILIHAN CALON ANGGOTA DPRD KABUPATEN MUSI BANYUASIN TAHUN 2024 (Studi Kasus di Dapil 1 Kecamatan Sekayu)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24903/fpb.v10i1.3505Keywords:
Money Politics Practices, Voter Decisions, Clientelism Theory, Bawaslu, Elections in Sekayu District.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of money politics on voter decision-making in the 2024 election of DPRD (Regional People's Representative Council) candidates in Musi Banyuasin Regency, particularly in Sekayu District, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of the socialization strategies implemented by the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) in preventing such practices. Money politics remains a prevalent phenomenon in electoral contests across various regions in Indonesia, especially in areas with low political awareness and economically vulnerable communities. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews involving voters, political brokers, community leaders, and electoral officials in Sekayu District. The analysis is based on the theory of clientelism by Stokes (2021), which highlights transactional relationships between patrons (candidates), brokers (intermediaries), and clients (voters). Patrons offer direct benefits, such as cash or basic necessities, in exchange for political support. The findings reveal that money politics continues to be a dominant strategy in influencing voter behavior, particularly among lower-income groups. Voters often feel a moral obligation to support candidates who have provided them with tangible benefits, regardless of their knowledge of the candidate’s vision and mission. Meanwhile, Bawaslu’s socialization strategies have proven to be insufficient in effectively reaching all segments of society, particularly marginalized groups most susceptible to material inducements. The results of this study indicate that money politics significantly affects voter decisions, and preventive efforts by electoral supervisory institutions must be strengthened through more participatory and context-sensitive approaches in order to foster greater political awareness, integrity, and independence among voters.
References
Akhmad, Z., Thamrin, U., & Santosa, R. (2023). Sosialisasi pendidikan politik bagi pemilih pemula di SMK Negeri 5 Kabupaten Bulukumba. EJOIN: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(4), 202-216.
Ambardi, K. (2009). Mengungkap politik uang di pemilu: Perspektif sosiologi politik. Kompas.
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2016). Politik uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan klientelisme pada pemilu. UGM Press.
Busco, V. (2004). Political exchange: Vote buying in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Wiley.
Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)rationality of citizens. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 621-635.
Hasan, M. (2023). Reformasi politik untuk meningkatkan kualitas demokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Demokrasi dan Kebijakan, 8(1), 45-60.
Hidayat, A. (2024). Transparansi dalam politik: Kunci untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan publik. Jurnal Etika dan Kebijakan Publik, 10(1), 22-38.
Kurniawan, A., & Rachmawati, I. (2021). Dampak politik uang terhadap kualitas pemilu dan legitimasi hasil pemilu di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 16(2), 34-50.
Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2024). Laporan Penyelenggaraan Pemilu 2024. Jakarta: KPU RI.
Lucyanti bagikan uang 100 ribu rupiah. Retrieved from https://lensarakyat.net/2024/02/diduga-money-politik-caleg-dprd-provinsi-dapil-muba-hj-lucyanti-bagikan-uang-100-ribu-rupiah/
Moleong, L. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi).
Nugroho. (2020). Transformasi demokrasi di Indonesia. Pustaka Nusantara.
Palembang.tribunnews.com. (2024, Februari 27). Ada 105 laporan pelanggaran pemilu 2024, Bawaslu Sumsel: Didominasi dugaan money politik. Retrieved from https://palembang.tribunnews.com/2024/02/27/ada-105-laporan-pelanggaran-pemilu-2024-bawaslu-sumsel-didominasi-dugaan-money-politik
Retrieved from https://tirto.id/survei-indikator-toleransi-politik-uang-tinggi-pada-pemilu-2024-gWaJ
Susanto. (2023). Sistem proporsional dan dinamika pemilu di Indonesia. Penerbit Demokrasi.
Tapsell, R. (2017). Media power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, citizens and the digital revolution. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
White, L. T. (2009). Political behavior and electoral systems. Oxford University Press.
Zuniati. (2024). Tantangan demokrasi dan pemilu di Indonesia modern. Pustaka Demokrasi.
Lensarakyat.net. (2024, Februari 12). Diduga money politik, caleg DPRD Provinsi Dapil Muba Hj .
Tirto.id. (2024, Februari 21). Survei Indikator: Toleransi politik uang tinggi pada pemilu 2024.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yusril Mahendra, Taufik Akhyar, Deany Afriani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.